How the Use of POFMA Against Episode 8 Proves I Was Right About POFMA

Historian Thum Ping Tjin (“PJ”) responds to the POFMA order by Minister of Law K Shanmugam against Episode 8 of “The Show with PJ Thum”, by analysing how Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019 (POFMA) was used against Episode 8. He notes how the POFMA order did not challenge any of the fundamental conclusions of Episode 8; and demonstrates how its use against Episode 8 proves his arguments correct. He also shows how the PAP government have not kept their word. They have used the law against interpretations; against statements which do not cause public harm; and against Singaporean critics – all of which they said they would not do.

For more of “The Show with PJ Thum”, please see

New Naratif explains and explores the forces which shape Southeast Asia. Find out more about our movement at Please join our movement at or donate at – your funds support all our original, hard hitting, independent research and journalism.

Bookmark (0)
ClosePlease login

Related Articles